Resolution MSC.141(76)
REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD UNDER RESOLUTION 14 OF THE 1995 SOLAS CONFERENCE
(adopted
on 5 December 2002)
THE
MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE,
RECALLING
Article 38(c) of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization
concerning the functions of the Committee,
RECALLING
ALSO resolution 14 on Regional agreements on specific stability requirements
for ro-ro passenger ships, adopted by the Conference of Contracting Governments
to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (the 1995
SOLAS Conference),
NOTING
that resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS Conference includes an option whereby the
Administration may, as an alternative to calculation of the stability
properties of a ship, accept model tests carried out for an individual ship in
accordance with the model test method developed by the Organization, as
appended to the Annex to the said resolution,
BEING
AWARE of the experience gained from model tests carried out in the past by
Administrations using the aforementioned model test method,
BEARING
IN MIND the compelling need to keep pace with new technology and knowledge,
HAVING
CONSIDERED the recommendation made by the Sub-Committee on Stability and Load
Lines and on Fishing Vessels Safety at its forty-fifth session,
1.
ADOPTS the Revised Model Test Method under resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS
Conference, including the associated Guidance Notes appended thereto, the text
of which is set out in the Annex to the present resolution;
2.
INVITES Member Governments which are party to regional agreements under
resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS Conference to use the annexed Revised Model
Test Method and associated Guidance Notes in lieu of the original model test
method appended to the said resolution.
ANNEX.
REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD
This
revised model test method is a revision of the method contained in the Appendix
to the Annex to resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS Conference. Since the entry
into force of the Stockholm Agreement a number of model tests has been carried
out in accordance with the test method previously in force. During these tests
a number of refinements in the procedures have been identified. This new model
test method aims to include these refinements and, together with the appended
Guidance Notes, provide a more robust procedure for the assessment of
survivability of a damaged ro-ro passenger ship in a seaway. In this respect,
the model should prove capable of withstanding the seaway defined in paragraph
4 below, in the worst damage case scenario.
LBP is
the length between perpendiculars
HS is
the significant wave height
B is the
moulded breadth of the ship
TP is
the peak period
TZ
is the zero crossing period
3.1.1
The model should copy the actual ship for both outer configuration and internal
arrangement in particular all damaged spaces having an effect on the process of
flooding and shipping of water. Intact draught, trim, heel and limiting
operational KG corresponding to the worst damage case should be used.
Furthermore, the test case(s) to be considered should represent the worst
damage case(s) defined in accordance with SOLAS regulation II-1/8.2.3.2 (SOLAS
90) with regard to the total area under the positive GZ curve and the
centreline of the damage opening should be located within the following range:
.1 35% LBP from
midship;
.2 an additional test will
be required for the worst damage within 10% LBP from midship if the damage case referred to
in .1 is outside of 10% LBP
from midship.
3.2
The model should comply with the following:
.1 the length between
perpendiculars (LBP) should be at least 3 m or a length
corresponding to a model scale of 1:40, whichever is greater, and the vertical
extent up to at least 3 superstructure standard heights above the bulkhead
(freeboard) deck;
.2 hull thickness of flooded
spaces should not exceed 4 mm;
.3 in both intact and
damaged conditions, the model should satisfy the correct displacement and
draught marks (TA, TM, TF, port and starboard)
with a maximum tolerance in any one draught mark of +2 mm. Draught marks
forward and aft should be located as near FP and AP as practicable;
.4 all damaged compartments
and ro-ro spaces should be modelled with the correct surface and volume
permeabilities (actual values and distributions) ensuring that floodwater mass
and mass distribution are correctly represented;
.5 the actual ship
characteristics of motion should be modelled properly, paying particular
attention to the intact GM tolerance and radii of gyration in roll and pitch
motion. Both radii should be measured in air and be in the range of 0.35B to
0.4B for roll motion, and 0.2LOA to 0.25LOA for pitch
motion;
.6 main design features such
as watertight bulkheads, air escapes, etc., above and below the bulkhead deck
that can result in asymmetric flooding should be modelled properly as far as
practicable, to represent the real situation. Ventilating and cross-flooding
arrangements should be constructed to a minimum cross section of 500 mm2
;
.7 the shape of the damage
opening at side should be as follows:
.1 trapezoidal profile with
side at 15 slope to the vertical and the width at the design waterline defined
according to SOLAS regulation II-1/8.4.1;
.2 isosceles triangular
profile in the horizontal plane with the height equal to B/5 according to SOLAS
regulation II-1/8.4.2. If side casings are fitted within B/5, the damaged
length in way of the side casings should not be less than 25 mm;
.3 notwithstanding the
provisions of subparagraphs .7.1 and .7.2 above, all compartments taken as
damaged in calculating the worst damage case(s) referred to in paragraph 3.1
should be flooded in the model tests.
3.3
The model in the flooded equilibrium condition should be heeled by an additional
angle corresponding to that induced by the heeling moment Mh = max(Mpass;
Mlaunch)- Mwind, but in no case should the final heel be
less than 1 towards damage. Mpass, Mlaunch and Mwind
are as specified in SOLAS regulation II-1/8.2.3.4. For existing ships
this angle may be taken as 1 .
4.1
The model should be tested in a long-crested irregular seaway defined by the
JONSWAP spectrum with significant wave height HS, a peak enhancement factor ¡ = 3.3 and a peak period TP
= 4ÖHs , (TZ
= TP/1.285). HS is the significant wave height for the
area of operation, which is not exceeded by a probability of more than 10% on a
yearly basis, but limited to a maximum of 4 m.
Furthermore,
.1 the basin width should be
sufficient to avoid contact or other interaction with the sides of the basin
and is recommended not to be less than LBP + 2 m;
.2 the basin depth should be
sufficient for proper wave modelling but should not be less than 1 m;
.3 for a representative wave
realisation to be used, measurements should be performed prior to the test at 3
different locations within the drift range;
.4 the wave probe closer to
the wave maker should be located at the position where the model is placed when
the test starts;
.5 variation in HS
and TP should be within 5% for the three locations; and
.6 during the tests, for
approval purposes, a tolerance of +2.5% in HS, 2.5% in TP and 5% in TZ should
be allowed with reference to the probe closer to the wave maker.
4.2
The model should be free to drift and placed in beam seas (90 heading) with
the damage facing the oncoming waves, with no mooring system permanently
attached to the model used. To maintain a beam sea heading of approximately 90
during the model test the following requirements should be satisfied:
.1 heading control lines,
intended for minor adjustment, should be located at the centre line of the stem
and stern, in a symmetrical fashion and at a level between the position of KG
and the damaged waterline; and
.2 the carriage speed should
be equal to the actual drift speed of the model with speed adjustment made when
necessary.
4.3
At least 10 experiments should be carried out. The test period for each
experiment should be of a duration such that a stationary state is reached, but
not less than 30 min in full-scale. A different wave realisation train should
be used for each experiment.
5.1
The model should be considered as surviving if a stationary state is reached
for the successive test runs required in 4.3.
5.2
The model should be considered as capsized if angles of roll of more than 30
to the vertical axis or steady (average) heel greater than 20 for a period
longer than 3 minutes full-scale occur, even if a stationary state is reached.
6.1
The model test programme should be approved by the Administration in advance.
6.2
Tests should be documented by means of a report and a video or other visual
records containing all relevant information on the model and the test results,
which are to be approved by the Administration. These should include, as a
minimum, the theoretical and measured wave spectra and statistics (HS,
TP, TZ) of the wave elevation at the 3 different
locations in the basin for a representative realisation, and for the tests with
the model, the time series of main statistics of the measured wave elevation
close to the wave maker and records of model roll, heave and pitch motions, and
of the drift speed.
ATTACHMENT.
GUIDANCE NOTES ON THE REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD
The
purpose of these notes is to ensure uniformity in the methods employed in the
construction and verification of the model as well as the undertaking and
analyses of the model tests, while appreciating that available facilities and
costs will affect in some way this uniformity.
The
contents of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Revised Model Test Method are considered
self-explanatory.
3.1
The material of which the model is made is not important in itself, provided
that the model, both in the intact and damaged condition, is sufficiently rigid
to ensure that its hydrostatic properties are the same as those of the actual
ship and also that the flexural response of the hull in waves is negligible.
It
is also important to ensure that the damaged compartments are modelled as
accurately as practicably possible to ensure that the correct volume of
floodwater is represented.
Since
ingress of water (even small amounts) into the intact parts of the model will
affect its behaviour, measures must be taken so that this ingress does not
occur.
In
model tests involving worst SOLAS damages near the ship ends, it was observed
that progressive flooding was not possible because of the tendency of the water
on deck to accumulate near the damage opening and hence flow out. As such
models were able to survive very high sea states, while they capsized in lesser
sea states with less onerous SOLAS damages, away from the ends, the limit 35%
was introduced to prevent this.
Extensive
research carried out for the purpose of developing appropriate criteria for new
vessels has clearly shown that in addition to the GM and freeboard being
important parameters in the survivability of passenger ships, the area under
the residual stability curve is also another major factor. Consequently in
choosing the worst SOLAS damage for compliance with the requirement of
paragraph 3.5.1 the worst damage is to be taken as that which gives the least
area under the residual stability curve.
3.2
Model particulars
.1 In recognising that scale
effects play an important role in the behaviour of the model during tests it is
important to ensure that these effects are minimised as much as practically
possible. The model should be as large as possible since details of damaged
compartments are easier constructed in larger models and the scale effects are
reduced. It is therefore required that the model length is not less than that
corresponding to 1:40 scale or 3 m, whichever is greater.
It has been found during tests
that the vertical extent of the model can affect the results when tested
dynamically. It is therefore required that the ship be modelled to at least
three superstructure standard heights above the bulkhead (freeboard) deck so
that the large waves of the wave train do not break over the model.
.2 The model in way of the
assumed damages should be as thin as practically possible to ensure that the
amount of floodwater and its centre of gravity are adequately represented. The
hull thickness should not exceed 4 mm. It is recognised that it may not be
possible for the model hull and the elements of primary and secondary
subdivision in way of the damage to be constructed with sufficient detail and
due to these constructional limitations it may not be possible to calculate
accurately the assumed permeability of the space.
.3 It is important that not
only the draughts in the intact condition are verified but also that the
draughts of the damaged model are accurately measured for correlation with
those derived from the damaged stability calculation. For practical reasons a
tolerance of +2 mm in any draught is accepted.
.4 After measuring the
damaged draughts it may be found necessary to make adjustments to the
permeability of the damaged compartment by either introducing intact volumes or
by adding weights. However, it is also important to ensure that the centre of
gravity of the floodwater is accurately represented. In this case any
adjustments made must err on the side of safety.
If the model is required to
be fitted with barriers on deck and their height is less than the bulkhead
height indicated below, the model should be fitted with CCTV so that any
"splashing over" and any accumulation of water on the undamaged area
of the deck can be monitored. In this case a video recording of the event
should form part of the tests records.
The height of transverse or
longitudinal bulkheads which are taken into account as effective to confine the
assumed accumulated sea water in the compartment concerned in the damaged ro-ro
deck should be at least 4 m in height unless the height of water is less than
0.5 m. In such cases the height of the bulkhead may be calculated in accordance
with the following:
Bh
= 8hw
where Bh is the
bulkhead height; and
hw is the
height of water.
In any event, the minimum
height of the bulkhead should be not less than 2.2 m. However, in the case of a
ship with hanging car decks, the minimum height of the bulkhead should be not
less than the height to the underside of the hanging car deck when in its
lowered position.
.5 In order to ensure that
the model motion characteristics represent those of the actual ship it is
important that the model is inclined in the intact condition so that the intact
GM is verified. The mass distribution should be measured in air. The transverse
radius of gyration of the actual ship should be in the range 0.35B to 0.4B and
the longitudinal radius of gyration should be in the range 0.2L to 0.25L.
Note: While inclining and rolling the model in the
damage condition may be accepted as a check for the purpose of verifying the
residual stability curve, such tests should not be accepted in lieu of the
intact tests.
.6 It is assumed that the
ventilators of the damaged compartment of the actual ship are adequate for
unhindered flooding and movement of the floodwater. However in trying to scale
down the ventilating arrangements of the actual ship undesirable scale effects
may be introduced. In order to ensure that these do not occur it is recommended
to construct the ventilating arrangements to a larger scale than that of the
model, ensuring that this does not affect the flow of water on the car
deck.
.7 It is deemed appropriate
to consider a damage shape representative of a cross section of the striking
ship in the bow region. The 15 angle is based on a study of the cross section
at a distance of B/5 from the bow for a representative selection of vessels of
different types and sizes.
The isosceles triangular
profile of the prismatic damage shape is that corresponding to the load
waterline.