|
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION |
|
E |
|
ASSEMBLY 26th
session Agenda
item 8 |
|
A
26/Res.1011 18
January 2010 Original:
ENGLISH |
Resolution
A.1012(26)
Adopted
on 2 December 2009
(Agenda
item 8)
HIGH-LEVEL
ACTION PLAN OF THE ORGANIZATION AND PRIORITIES
FOR
THE 2010-2011 BIENNIUM
THE
ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING the directives contained in
resolution A.500(XII) concerning coordination of the work of the Committees by
the Council, taking into account the views of the Committees on priorities and
their responsibilities for substantive technical and legal matters,
RECALLING ALSO the directives contained
in resolutions:
- A.777(18) on Work methods and organization
of work in Committees and their subsidiary bodies;
- A.900(21) on Objectives of the Organization
in the 2000s;
- A.901(21) on IMO and technical cooperation
in the 2000s; and
- A.909(22) on Policy making in IMO setting the Organizations policies and
objectives,
RECALLING FURTHER resolutions A.989(25)
and A.990(25), by which it approved, respectively, the Strategic Plan for the
Organization for the six-year period 2008 to 2013 and the High-level Action
Plan of the Organization and priorities for the 2008-2009 biennium,
HAVING ADOPTED resolutions A.1011(26)
providing an updated Strategic Plan for the Organization for the six-year
period 2010 to 2015 and A.1013(26) on Guidelines on the application of the
Strategic Plan and High-level Action Plan,
HAVING CONSIDERED the recommendations of
the Council, at its twenty-fifth extraordinary session, for the adoption of an
updated High-level Action Plan and related priorities for the 2010-2011
biennium, which have been prepared on the basis of the Strategic Plan and
inputs from the Maritime Safety Committee, the Legal Committee, the Marine
Environment Protection Committee, the Technical Co-operation Committee, the
Facilitation Committee and the Secretariat,
1. APPROVES the High-level Action Plan of
the Organization and priorities for the 2010-2011 biennium, as set out in the
annex to the present resolution;
2. REQUESTS the Council, the Maritime
Safety Committee, the Legal Committee, the Marine Environment Protection
Committee, the Technical Co-operation Committee, the Facilitation Committee and
the Secretariat, when reporting on their work to the Assembly at its
twenty-seventh regular session, and to the Council at its sessions during the
2010-2011 biennium, to ensure that they report progress towards fulfilling the
Organizations aims and objectives using the framework of the strategic
directions, high-level actions and planned biennial outputs;
3. ALSO REQUESTS the Council, the
Committees and the Secretariat, when considering proposals for unplanned
outputs, to ensure that, in accordance with resolution A.1013(26) and the
guidelines for the organization and method of their work, as appropriate, the
issues to be addressed are those which fall within the scope of the Strategic
Plan and the High-level Action Plan;
4. FURTHER REQUESTS the Committees and the
Secretariat, as appropriate and in accordance with resolution A.1013(26), to
submit to the Council for endorsement the unplanned outputs they may approve
during the 2010-2011 biennium, for inclusion in the High-level Action Plan for
that biennium;
5. AUTHORIZES the Council to endorse such
unplanned outputs and to incorporate them into the High-level Action Plan and
priorities for the 2010-2011 biennium, as set out in the annex to the present
resolution;
6. EMPHASIZES that the high-level actions
and related outputs, especially those involving amendments to existing
conventions (particularly those which have been in force for a short period)
should take fully into account the directives in resolution A.500(XII); and
that due attention should be given to the requirement that a well-documented
compelling need must be demonstrated for the development and adoption of new or
revised standards;
7. REITERATES ITS REQUESTS to the Council
and the Committees:
.1 to review and revise, during the
2010-2011 biennium, the guidelines for the organization and method of their
work in the light of resolution A.1013(26); and
.2 when making recommendations for their
biennial agendas, to bear in mind the desirability of not scheduling more than
one diplomatic conference in each year, save in exceptional circumstances;
8. REVOKES resolution A.990(25).
ANNEX
1 The Organizations Strategic Plan for
the period 2010 to 2015 (resolution A.1011(26)) includes thirteen key strategic
directions to enable IMO to achieve its mission objectives. In order for the
Organization to effectively address those strategic objectives, a High-level
Action Plan has been developed which identifies the actions required and
provides the linkage between the Organizations strategy and the work of the
various IMO organs.
2 The High-level Action Plan thus
identifies the high-level actions necessary to achieve the strategic objectives
in the Strategic Plan, as well as the priorities for the 2010-2011 biennium in
response to those identified actions.
3 The progress of the Organization
towards fulfilling its aims and objectives will be monitored through the series
of performance indicators in the Strategic Plan and also by monitoring progress
against the planned outputs for the biennium.
STRATEGIC
DIRECTIONS AND CORRESPONDING HIGH-LEVEL ACTIONS
|
No. |
Strategic
Directions (SDs) (resolution A.1011(26)) |
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
|
Broad
category: Enhancing the status and effectiveness of IMO |
|||
|
1 |
IMO
is the primary international forum for technical matters of all kinds
affecting international shipping and legal matters related thereto. An
inclusive and comprehensive approach to such matters will be a hallmark of
IMO. In order to maintain that primacy, it will: |
|
|
|
1.1 |
Further
develop its role in maritime affairs vis--vis other intergovernmental
organizations, so as to be able to deal effectively and comprehensively with
complex cross-agency issues |
1.1.1 |
Take
the lead and actively promote its role as the primary international forum on matters
within its purview |
|
1.1.2 |
Cooperate
with the United Nations and other international bodies on matters of mutual
interest |
||
|
1.2 |
Actively
engage the various stakeholders new and existing in the shipping arena,
including non-governmental organizations, industry and the public in general,
to ensure a more inclusive approach to decision-making |
1.2.1 |
Further encourage
the active participation of
all stakeholders to
achieve the Organizations
mission objectives through consultation and liaison |
|
1.3 |
Actively
seek to reap synergies and avoid duplicating efforts made by other UN
agencies in shipping matters |
1.3.1 |
Consider
issues under the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention relevant to the
role of the Organization |
|
1.3.2 |
Follow-up
to the activities of UNCED and WSSD, including prevention of marine pollution
from offshore oil and gas activities |
||
|
1.3.3 |
Monitor
developments within GESAMP and make full use of the knowledge available and
gained |
||
|
1.3.4 |
Promote
facilitation measures |
||
|
1.3.5 |
Harmonize
IMO instruments with other relevant international instruments, as necessary |
||
|
2 |
IMO
will foster global compliance with its instruments governing international shipping
and will promote their uniform implementation by Member States |
2.0.1 |
Monitor
and improve conventions, etc., and provide interpretation thereof if
requested by
Member States |
|
2.0.2 |
Encourage
and support implementation of the Voluntary IMO Member State Audit Scheme |
||
|
2.0.3 |
Encourage
the worldwide provision of maritime search and rescue services |
||
|
3 |
IMO
will strengthen its capacity-building programmes and will focus on: |
|
|
|
3.1 |
Developing
capacity-building partnerships with governments, organizations and industry |
3.1.1 |
Participate
in environmental programmes with UNDP, UNEP, World Bank, etc. |
|
3.1.2 |
Establish
partnerships with governments, organizations and industry to enhance the delivery
of IMOs capacity-building programmes |
||
|
3.1.3 |
Promote
and strengthen partnerships with global maritime training institutions and
training programmes |
||
|
3.2 |
Ensuring
the long-term sustainability of the ITCP |
3.2.1 |
Mobilize
and allocate financial or in-kind resources including the promotion of technical
and economic cooperation among developing countries (TCDC and ECDC) |
|
3.2.2 |
Implement
the approved mechanism to ensure the sustainable financing of the ITCP |
||
|
3.3 |
Contributing
to the achievement of the MDGs |
3.3.1 |
Establish,
maintain and promote the linkage between the ITCP and the MDGs |
|
No. |
Strategic
Directions (SDs) (resolution A.1011(26)) |
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
|
3.4 |
Meeting
the needs of its developing Member States |
3.4.1 |
Implement
the arrangements to identify the emerging needs of developing States in
general and the developmental needs of SIDS and LDCs in particular |
|
3.5 |
Improving
the delivery, utilization and effectiveness of its technical cooperation
programmes |
3.5.1 |
Consider,
prioritize and implement technical cooperation programmes |
|
3.5.2 |
Strengthen
the role of women in the maritime sector |
||
|
3.5.3 |
Develop
new measures to improve the delivery of technical assistance |
||
|
3.5.4 |
Undertake
regular TC impact assessments |
||
|
4 |
Internally,
IMO should be able to respond effectively and efficiently to emerging trends,
developments, and challenges. It will strive for excellence in governance and
management. Besides the Strategic Plan, it will maintain a risk management
framework. The Council will provide visionary leadership, Committees will be
optimally structured and will be supported by an effective and efficient
Secretariat. The Secretariat will be endowed with sufficient resources and
expertise to realize the Organizations work plans within approved biennial
appropriations, and the Organization will make effective use of information
and communication technology in management and administration. |
4.0.1 |
Ensure that the Organization, within agreed appropriations, uses
its resources efficiently and
effectively |
|
4.0.2 |
Create a
knowledge and information-based Organization through
improved management and dissemination of information making use of
appropriate technology |
||
|
4.0.3 |
Enhance
transparency in the Organizations operations |
||
|
4.0.4 |
Maintain
a risk management framework |
||
|
4.0.5 |
Keep
under review working methods and processes |
||
|
4.0.6 |
Provide
independent and effective internal oversight and evaluation functions |
||
|
4.0.7 |
Coordinate
and monitor the delivery of the Organizations work plans |
||
|
Broad
category: Developing and maintaining a comprehensive framework for safe,
secure, efficient and environmentally sound shipping |
|||
|
5 |
IMOs
highest priority will be the safety of human life at sea. In particular,
greater emphasis will be accorded to: |
|
|
|
5.1 |
Ensuring
that all systems related to enhancing the safety of human life at sea are
adequate, including those concerned with large concentrations of people |
5.1.1 |
Review
the adequacy of passenger ship safety provisions |
|
5.1.2 |
Development
and review of safe evacuation, survival, recovery and treatment of people
following maritime casualties or in case of distress |
||
|
5.1.3 |
Enhance
the safety of navigation in vital shipping lanes |
||
|
5.2 |
Enhancing
technical, operational and safety management standards |
5.2.1 |
Keep
under review the technical and operational safety aspects of all types of
ships, including fishing vessels |
|
5.2.2 |
Development
and review of training and watchkeeping standards and operational procedures
for maritime personnel |
||
|
5.2.3 |
Keep
under review standards for safe handling and carriage by sea of solid and
liquid cargoes carried in bulk and packaged form |
||
|
5.2.4 |
Keep
under review measures to improve navigational safety, including ships
routeing, ship reporting systems, vessel traffic services, requirements and
standards for shipborne navigational
aids and systems |
||
|
5.2.5 |
Monitor
and evaluate the operation of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System
(GMDSS) |
||
|
5.2.6 |
Development
and implementation of the e-navigation strategy |
||
|
5.3 |
Eliminating
shipping that fails to meet and maintain these standards on a continuous
basis |
5.3.1 |
Keep
under review flag and port State procedures for the control of ships |
|
5.4 |
Increasing
the emphasis on the role of the human element in safe shipping |
5.4.1 |
Develop
a strategy for the work related to the role of the human element including
the chain of responsibility in maritime safety |
|
No. |
Strategic
Directions (SDs) (resolution A.1011(26)) |
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
|
6 |
IMO
will seek to enhance the security of the maritime transport network,
including vital shipping lanes, and to reduce piracy and armed robbery
against ships, as well as the frequency of stowaway incidents, by: |
|
|
|
6.1 |
Promoting
a comprehensive and cooperative approach, both among Member States within the
Organization and between IMO and other intergovernmental and non-governmental
organizations |
6.1.1 |
Keep
under review measures (e.g., ISPS Code) to enhance security for ship and port
facilities including the ship/port interface and shipping lanes of strategic
importance |
|
6.1.2 |
Keep
under review the adequacy of the legal framework to suppress unlawful acts
against ships and fixed platforms through the SUA Convention and its Protocol |
||
|
6.2 |
Raising
awareness of IMO security measures and promoting their effective
implementation |
6.2.1 |
Promulgate
information on prevention and suppression of acts of piracy and armed robbery
against ships |
|
6.2.2 |
Assist
developing regions in their introduction and implementation of effective
security measures and measures against piracy and armed robbery against ships |
||
|
6.3 |
Increasing
the emphasis on the role of the human element and safeguarding the human
rights of seafarers in secure shipping |
6.3.1 |
Actively
participate in work of the Joint IMO/ILO ad hoc expert working groups
on issues related to safeguarding the human rights of seafarers |
|
6.3.2 |
Develop
a strategy for the work related to the role of the human element including
the chain of responsibility in maritime security |
||
|
7 |
IMO
will focus on reducing and eliminating any adverse impact by shipping on the
environment by: |
|
|
|
7.1 |
Identifying
and addressing possible adverse impacts |
7.1.1 |
Monitor
pollution and adverse impact on the marine environment caused by ships and
their cargoes |
|
7.1.2 |
Keep
under review measures to reduce adverse impact on the marine environment by
ships |
||
|
7.1.3 |
Monitor
and keep under review the provision of reception facilities in ports and
their adequacy |
||
|
7.1.4 |
Consider
the need for the development of measures to prevent and control marine
pollution from small craft |
||
|
7.2 |
Developing
effective measures for mitigating and responding to the impact on the
environment caused by shipping incidents and operational pollution from ships |
7.2.1 |
Keep
under review the guidelines on the identification of places of refuge |
|
7.2.2 |
Keep
under review the adequacy of the legal framework |
||
|
7.2.3 |
Foster
cooperation and mutual assistance between Member States under the provisions
of the OPRC Convention and OPRC-HNS Protocol |
||
|
7.3 |
Contributing
to international efforts to reduce atmospheric pollution and address climate
change and global warming |
7.3.1 |
Keep
under review IMO measures to reduce atmospheric pollution |
|
7.3.2 |
Continue
to develop appropriate measures to address climate change and global warming |
||
|
7.4 |
Increasing
the emphasis on the role of the human element in environmentally sound
shipping |
7.4.1 |
Develop
a strategy for the work related to the role of the human element including
the chain of responsibility in marine environment protection |
|
8 |
IMO
will seek to ensure that measures to promote safe, secure and environmentally
sound shipping do not unduly affect the efficiency of shipping, including
port entry. It will also constantly review such measures to ensure their adequacy,
effectiveness and relevance, using the best available tools, and to reduce
administrative burdens. |
8.0.1 |
Promote
wider acceptance of the FAL Convention and adoption of measures contained
therein, to assist the FAL Committees effort and work towards the universal
implementation of measures to facilitate international maritime traffic |
|
8.0.2 |
Ensure
that an appropriate balance is maintained between measures to enhance
maritime security and measures to facilitate maritime international traffic |
|
No. |
Strategic
Directions (SDs) (resolution A.1011(26)) |
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
|
|
|
8.0.3 |
Encourage
the use of information and communication technology to drive continuous
improvement and innovation in the facilitation of maritime traffic |
|
8.0.4 |
Consider
ways of systematically reducing the administrative burden deriving from the
legislative process |
||
|
9 |
IMO
will pay special attention to the shipping needs of small island developing
States (SIDS) and the least developed countries (LDCs) |
9.0.1 |
Identify
and address the special shipping needs of SIDS and LDCs |
|
10 |
IMO
will apply goal-based standards for maritime safety |
10.0.1 |
Further
develop measures to apply goal-based standards for maritime safety |
|
Broad
category: Enhancing the profile of shipping, quality culture and
environmental conscience |
|||
|
11 |
IMO,
in partnership with other stakeholders, will seek to raise the profile of the
safety, security and environmental records of shipping in the eyes of civil
society by: |
|
|
|
11.1 |
Actively
publicizing the vital importance of shipping as a safe, secure and
environmentally sound mode of transport for goods and people, and underlining
the role of the Organization in that regard |
11.1.1 |
Raise
awareness of the role of international shipping in world trade and the global
economy and the importance of the Organizations role |
|
11.1.2 |
Enhance
the image of the role of the human element in the context of the shipping
industry |
||
|
11.2 |
Actively
developing its community relations programmes |
11.2.1 |
Actively
promote and encourage the development of community relations programmes |
|
12 |
IMO
will take the lead in enhancing the quality of shipping by: |
|
|
|
12.1 |
Encouraging
the utilization of the best available techniques not entailing excessive
costs, in all aspects of shipping |
12.1.1 |
Use
formal safety assessment techniques in the development of technical standards |
|
12.1.2 |
Use
risk-based tools that take account of costs and the human element in the
development of operational standards |
||
|
12.2 |
Encouraging
proper management of ships |
12.2.1 |
Keep
under review the effectiveness of the ISM Code with regard to safety and
protection of the marine environment |
|
12.3 |
Promoting
and enhancing the availability of, and access to, information including
casualty information relating to ship safety and security (i.e.
transparency) |
12.3.1 |
Consider
the wider dissemination of information, analyses and decisions, taking
account of the financial implications |
|
12.4 |
Ensuring
that all stakeholders understand and accept their responsibilities regarding
safe, secure and environmentally sound shipping by developing a chain of
responsibility concept among them |
12.4.1 |
Raise
awareness of the chain of responsibility concept among all stakeholders
through organizations that have consultative status |
|
12.5 |
Identifying,
correlating and evaluating the factors, including human interaction on board
ships, that influence safety and security culture, and developing practical
and effective mechanisms to address them |
12.5.1 |
Promote
bridge resource management |
|
13 |
IMO
will seek to enhance environmental conscience within the shipping community |
13.0.1 |
Strengthen
awareness of the need for a continuous reduction of the adverse impact of
shipping on the environment |
|
13.0.2 |
Promote
and enhance the availability of, and access to, information relating to
environmental protection (i.e. transparency) and, in particular, consider the
wider dissemination of information, analyses and decisions, taking account of
the financial implications |
||
|
13.0.3 |
Encourage
the use in shipping of the best available environmental technology not
entailing excessive costs, in line with the goal of sustainable development |
||
HIGH-LEVEL ACTIONS AND RELATED PLANNED
OUTPUTS
|
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
No. |
Planned
outputs (POs) for 2010-2011 |
|
Broad
category: Enhancing the status and effectiveness of IMO |
|||
|
1.1.1 |
Take
the lead and actively promote its role as the primary international forum on
matters within its purview |
1.1.1.1 |
Note:
POs of the Organization meeting this high-level action are tabulated in this
annex against the most relevant HLAs |
|
Permanent
analysis, demonstration and promotion of the linkage between a safe, secure,
efficient and environmentally friendly maritime transport infrastructure, the
development of global trade and the world economy and the achievement of the
MDGs (Assembly, Council, all committees and Secretariat) |
|||
|
1.1.2 |
Cooperate
with the United Nations and other international bodies on matters of mutual
interest |
1.1.2.1 |
Cooperation
with FAO: follow-up to the second session of the IMO/FAO Working Group on IUU
fishing and related matters, including safety regulations for fishing vessels
and fishers; and identification of revisions to the 1993 Torremolinos
Protocol which may be needed to make the Protocol acceptable to the required
number of Governments to ensure entry into force, possibly through the
development of an additional instrument (MSC) |
|
1.1.2.2 |
Cooperation
with IACS: consideration of unified interpretations (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.3 |
Cooperation
with IAEA: formalized emergency arrangements for response to
nuclear/radiological emergencies from ships, including IMO contribution to
the next version of the Joint Radiation Emergency Management Plan of the
International Organizations (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.4 |
Cooperation
with ILO: port State control of seafarers working hours (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.5 |
Cooperation
with ILO and others: approved recommendations based on the work, if any, of
the Joint IMO/ILO Ad Hoc Expert Working Group on Fair Treatment of
Seafarers in the Event of a Maritime Accident, CMI, and others concerning the
application of the joint IMO/ILO Guidelines on the fair treatment of
seafarers and consequential further actions as necessary (LEG) |
||
|
1.1.2.6 |
Cooperation
with IHO: hydrographic issues (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.7 |
Cooperation
with data providers: protocols on data exchange with international, regional
and national entities (all committees, as appropriate/Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.8 |
Cooperation
with donor institutions: resource mobilization for ITCP (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.9 |
Cooperation
with ICAO: annual meeting of the Joint ICAO/IMO Working Group on the
Harmonization of Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (monitoring of
SAR developments, continuous review of the IAMSAR Manual and developing
recommendations for consideration by the COMSAR Sub-Committee) (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.10 |
Cooperation
with ITU: annual meeting of the Joint IMO/ITU Experts Group on Maritime
Radiocommunications matters (coordination of maritime related issues for ITU
R Study Group meetings and World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRCs) and
the development of the IMO position for WRC 2011) (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.11 |
Cooperation
with UNEP: joint initiatives with regional pollution response centres
(Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.12 |
Cooperation
with the Joint Inspection Unit (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.13 |
Liaison
statements to/from IALA: VTS, aids to navigation, e-navigation and AIS
matters (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.14 |
Liaison
statements to/from IEC: radiocommunications and safety of navigation (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.15 |
Liaison
statements to/from IHO: hydrographic matters and promotion of ENCs covering
various parts of the globe (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.16 |
Liaison
statements to/from ILO: seafarers issues (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.17 |
Liaison
statements to/from ITU: radiocommunications (MSC) |
||
|
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
No. |
Planned
outputs (POs) for 2010-2011 |
|
|
|
1.1.2.18 |
Liaison
statements to/from UNHCR: persons rescued at sea (MSC) |
|
1.1.2.19 |
Liaison
statements to/from WMO: meteorological issues (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.20 |
Policy
input/guidance to IAEA: development of carriage requirements for class 7
radioactive material (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.21 |
Policy
input/guidance to ILO: development of PSC guidelines in the context of the
Maritime Labour Convention (MLC), 2006 (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.22 |
Policy
input/guidance to IMO/FAO Working Group on IUU fishing and related matters:
safety regulations for fishing vessels and fishermen (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.23 |
Policy
input/guidance to ISO TC 8: development of industry consensus standards (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.24 |
Policy
input/guidance to PSC regimes: related IMO developments (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.25 |
Policy
input/guidance to UN Sub-Committee on Dangerous Goods: harmonization of
multimodal transport of dangerous goods (MSC) |
||
|
1.1.2.26 |
Policy input/guidance to
Environment Management Group
(established by UN
General Assembly resolution
A/53/463UN): inter-agency sharing of information and agreement on priorities
(MEPC/Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.27 |
Policy
input/guidance on GESAMP-related IMO developments (MEPC) |
||
|
1.1.2.28 |
Policy
input/guidance to GESAMP-BW Working Group: evaluation of active substances
used by ballast water management systems (MEPC) |
||
|
1.1.2.29 |
Policy
input/guidance to GESAMP-EHS Working Group: evaluation of bulk chemicals
(MEPC) |
||
|
1.1.2.30 |
Policy
input/guidance to UNFCCC: greenhouse gas emissions from ships (MEPC) |
||
|
1.1.2.31 |
Policy
input/guidance to UN Globally Harmonized System: classification and labelling
of products (MEPC) |
||
|
1.1.2.32 |
Policy
input/guidance to UN-Oceans: inter-agency coordination on oceans and coastal
issues (MEPC/Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.33 |
Policy input/guidance to
UN Regular Process:
assessment of the
state of the
marine environment
(MEPC/Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.34 |
Policy
input/guidance to IAEA: facilitation of the shipment of class 7 radioactive
materials (FAL) |
||
|
1.1.2.35 |
Policy input/guidance to
UNECE/UNCEFACT: trade facilitation and
electronic transmission of information-related matters (FAL) |
||
|
1.1.2.36 |
Policy
input/guidance to UNODC/WCO: prevention and control of illicit drug
trafficking (FAL) |
||
|
1.1.2.37 |
Policy/input
guidance to WCO: clearance of ships, persons and cargoes; and security of the
supply chain (FAL) |
||
|
1.1.2.38 |
Policy
and strategy for the implementation of the IMO-related aspects of the UN
Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (MSC/LEG/TCC/FAL) |
||
|
1.1.2.39 |
Monitor
the progress of the amendments to ILO MLC 2006 and address the issue of
financial security in case of abandonment of seafarers, and shipowners
responsibilities in respect of contractual claims for personal injury to or
death of seafarers, should it be necessary (LEG) |
||
|
1.1.2.40 |
Advice
and guidance on issues, as may be requested, in connection with
implementation of SUA 1988/2005 in the context of international efforts to combat
terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related
materials (LEG) |
||
|
1.1.2.41 |
Meetings
and/or consultations on Delivering as One: UN collaboration on technical
cooperation in the maritime sector in response to the Delivering as One
report of the Secretary Generals High-level Panel on UN System-wide
coherence in the areas of development, humanitarian assistance and
environment (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.1.2.42 |
Follow-up
to the 3rd meeting of the Joint ILO/IMO/BC Working Group on Ship Scrapping
(MEPC) |
|
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
No. |
Planned
outputs (POs) for 2010-2011 |
|
1.2.1 |
Further
encourage the active participation of all stakeholders to achieve the
Organizations mission objectives through consultation and liaison |
1.2.1.1 |
Protocol
to the HNS Convention adopted as soon as possible (LEG) |
|
1.2.1.2 |
Joint
programmes, meetings and press conferences with UN and other international
organizations, as well as industry and civil society interests (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.2.1.3 |
Agreements
of cooperation with IGOs and approved consultative status for NGOs (Assembly,
Council, Secretariat) |
||
|
1.2.1.4 |
Coordination
and management of the multi-agency GESAMP Office (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.2.1.5 |
Revised
Guidelines on implementation of the HNS Protocol to facilitate ratifications
and harmonized interpretation (LEG) |
||
|
1.2.1.6 |
Strategies
developed to facilitate entry into force of the 2002 Athens Protocol, the
2005 SUA Protocols and the 2007 Nairobi Wreck Removal Convention (LEG) |
||
|
1.3.1 |
Consider
issues under the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention relevant to the
role of the Organization |
1.3.1.1 |
Advice
and guidance provided following referrals from other IMO organs and Member
States (LEG) |
|
1.3.1.2 |
Circular
on implications of UNCLOS for IMO (Secretariat) |
||
|
1.3.1.3 |
Identification
of PSSAs, taking into account article 211 and other related articles of
UNCLOS (MEPC) |
||
|
1.3.2 |
Follow-up
to the activities of UNCED and WSSD, including prevention of marine pollution
from offshore oil and gas activities |
1.3.2.1 |
Contributions
to the follow-up to UNCED and WSSD (MEPC) |
|
1.3.2.2 |
Capacity-building
follow-up action reflected in the ITCP (TCC) |
||
|
1.3.3 |
Monitor
developments within GESAMP and make full use of the knowledge available and
gained |
1.3.3.1 |
Hazard
profiles and evaluation of newly submitted substances to be incorporated into
the IBC Code (MEPC) |
|
1.3.3.2 |
Approval
of active substances used by ballast water management systems (MEPC) |
||
|
1.3.4 |
Promote
facilitation measures |
1.3.4.1 |
Participation
in relevant international forums (Secretariat) |
|
1.3.4.2 |
FAL
module incorporated in the programme of maritime security training activities
(Secretariat) |
||
|
1.3.4.3 |
Finalized
Explanatory Manual to the FAL Convention (FAL) |
||
|
1.3.5 |
Harmonize
IMO instruments with other relevant international instruments, as necessary |
1.3.5.1 |
Harmonized
provisions relating to the safe, secure and efficient carriage of dangerous
goods following participation in the activities of UNCOE TDG, GHS and IAEA
(MSC) |
|
1.3.5.2 |
Amendments
to the ICAO/IMO IAMSAR Manual (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1 |
Monitor
and improve conventions, etc., and provide interpretation thereof if
requested by Member States |
2.0.1.1 |
Mandatory
instruments: review of the draft revised Fire Test Procedures Code (MSC) |
|
2.0.1.2 |
Mandatory
instruments: amendments to MARPOL Annexes I to VI, including revised MARPOL
Annex V (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.3 |
Mandatory
instruments: means for recharging air bottles for air breathing apparatus
(MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.4 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines for verification of damage stability requirements for
tankers and bulk carriers (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.5 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidance on the impact of open watertight doors on existing and
new ship survivability (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.6 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidance to ensure a consistent policy for watertight doors to
remain open during navigation (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.7 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidance on the interrelation between central control stations
and safety centres (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.8 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines to improve the effect on ship design and safety of
the 1969 TM Convention (MSC) |
|
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
No. |
Planned
outputs (POs) for 2010-2011 |
|
|
|
2.0.1.9 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: revised performance testing and approval standards for fire
safety systems (MSC) |
|
2.0.1.10 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines for the design, construction and testing of fixed
hydrocarbon gas detection system on double-hull tankers (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.11 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: clarified boundaries between MARPOL and the London Convention
1972 (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.12 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines for enforcement of MARPOL Annex I (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.13 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines for the BWM Convention (updating and consolidation of
existing guidelines) (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.14 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines for replacement engines not required to meet the Tier
III limit (MARPOL Annex VI) (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.15 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines on the provision of reception facilities (MARPOL
Annex VI) (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.16 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: other relevant guidelines pertaining to equivalents set forth in
regulation 4 of MARPOL Annex VI and not covered by other guidelines (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.17 |
Non-mandatory
instruments: guidelines called for under paragraph 2.2.5.6 of the NOx
Technical Code (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.18 |
Code
for Recognized Organizations (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.1.19 |
Protocol
to the HNS Convention adopted as soon as possible (LEG) |
||
|
2.0.1.20 |
Revised
Guidelines on implementation of the HNS Protocol to facilitate ratifications
and harmonized interpretation (LEG) |
||
|
2.0.1.21 |
Strategies
developed to facilitate entry into force of the 2002 Athens Protocol, the
2005 SUA Protocols, and the 2007 Nairobi Wreck Removal Convention (LEG) |
||
|
2.0.1.22 |
Advice
and guidance on issues brought to the Committee in connection with
implementation of IMO instruments (LEG) |
||
|
2.0.1.23 |
Consideration
of proposal to amend the limits of liability of the Protocol of 1996 to the
Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976 (LLMC 96), in
accordance with article 8 of LLMC 96 (LEG) |
||
|
2.0.1.24 |
Unified
interpretations of the MARPOL regulations (MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.25 |
Promotion
of the implementation of mandatory and non-mandatory instruments (MSC/MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.1.26 |
Reports
on the average sulphur content of residual fuel oil supplied for use on board
ships (MEPC/Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.1.27 |
Summary
reports and analyses of mandatory reports under MARPOL (MEPC/Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.1.28 |
GISIS
module on mandatory and non-mandatory requirements (Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.1.29 |
Interpretation
of application of SOLAS, MARPOL and Load Line requirements for major
conversions of oil tankers (MSC/MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.2 |
Encourage
and support implementation of the Voluntary IMO Member State Audit Scheme |
2.0.2.1 |
Input
related to marine environment protection to the Voluntary IMO Member State
Audit Scheme and to the Code for the implementation of mandatory IMO
instruments (MEPC) |
|
2.0.2.2 |
A
revised Code for the Implementation of Mandatory IMO Instruments (Assembly,
Council, MSC and MEPC) |
||
|
2.0.2.3 |
Implementation
of approved proposals for the further development of the Audit Scheme
(Assembly, Council, committees (as appropriate), Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.2.4 |
Organization,
delivery and reporting of State audits (Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.2.5 |
Up
to 60 auditors trained per year (Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.2.6 |
Capacity-building
aspects of the Scheme reflected in the ITCP (TCC) |
|
No. |
High-level
Actions (HLAs) |
No. |
Planned
outputs (POs) for 2010-2011 |
|
|
|
2.0.2.7 |
Implementation
of pre- and post-audit technical assistance activities (Secretariat) |
|
2.0.2.8 |
Methodology
for the analysis of consolidated audit summary reports (Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.3 |
Encourage
the worldwide provision of maritime search and rescue services |
2.0.3.1 |
Technical
guidance for the establishment of regional MRCCs and MRSCs in Africa,
supported by the ISAR Fund (MSC) |
|
2.0.3.2 |
Further
development of the Global SAR Plan for the provision of maritime SAR services
(MSC) |
||
|
2.0.3.3 |
ITCP
programme implemented to contribute to the worldwide provision of maritime
SAR services (Secretariat) |
||
|
2.0.3.4 |
Reports
of WMU project on SAR related to passenger ships (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.3.5 |
Reports
on the Cospas-Sarsat System monitored and the list of IMO documents and
publications which should be held by MRCCs updated (MSC) |
||
|
2.0.3.6 |
Harmonized
aeronautical and maritime search and rescue procedures, including SAR
training matters (MSC) |
||
|
3.1.1 |
Participate
in environmental programmes with UNDP, UNEP, World Bank, etc. |
3.1.1.1 |
Guidance
for the Secretariat concerning the environmental programmes and projects to
which the Organization contributes or executes, such as GEF, UNDP, UNEP and
World Bank projects or programmes, and the IMO/UNEP forum on regional
cooperation in combating marine pollution (MEPC) |